The Re-Revolutioned Windsock: Vox Populi
Welcome back to another year of peppy updates, complain-about-the-workload-columns, and candid camera shots. When Mr. Leonard asked Rose Jantzi and me to be the Windsock’s co-editors, I jumped at the offer. If I could have chosen any girl in the school to edit with, I could not have asked for a better partner than Rose. My first thought was, “What marvelous things shall we do with this opportunity? Let us count the ways…” Soon, however, I began to think that there were a few too many marvelous things and also to realize that, after a successful year online, the Windsock could go any one of a thousand different ways.
I am the little altruistic planning child who sits in on executive meetings and sighs, “Oh wouldn’t this be lovely? And wouldn’t this be almost as lovely? And OH! THIS IS THE LOVELIEST OPTION OF ALL!” However, as any mildly intelligent sixth grader well knows, these whimsical little blurbs must be sorted through and prioritized. When the rubber hits the road, direction trumps indirection, however appealing that indirection may be.
But how are your editors to arrive at this direction? If I thought only of myself, Rose and I would probably fulfill our editorial duties in grammatically slaying every article that came to us through the Windsock’s journalists and spouting our own quaint philosophies on the side. In fact, that’s a close description of what I likely will do without any outside guidance. But I don’t want that.
I want guidance. Specifically, I want your guidance. I know (believe me, I really do know) that you hate filling out pointless little polls as to what you prefer in which whatever and how you rate that or the other from 1 to 10. I don’t want your ratings. What I want is your preference.
The Windsock, in my year-long vision of the paper, should accurately reflect our student body. We don’t need to gloss over the grime. We don’t need to spend hours on perfecting our passive or active voices. We are the voices of our school.
In my year of journalism, I met many people, heard many stories, called many homes at suppertime and disrupted many meals. As the year progressed I learned to step away from my articles. I lost my voice to the voice of the people I interviewed. I struggled to get inside their minds, to understand their perspective and to portray that perspective exactly as I heard it. After years of trying to find my own voice as a writer, I discovered the voices of the people around me. I listened to them “Mmmmm, mmmm-ing” on the phone, and, the phrase I repeated time after time, “Tell me more.”
Not surprisingly, I am asking the student body for more again. I want your guidance to know which direction you want this paper to head. Do you want more sports shots? Do you want a chance to get your picture into the Top Ten Photographs of every month? Do you want a “Dear Abby” column? Perhaps you have an opinion to air, a joke to tell. Maybe you feel that your passion needs a soapbox. We want to be that soapbox.
If, in this year of student reporting, you feel that the Windsock has become dry or irrelevant, this is not only your journalists' failure to provide you with good reporting. It is also your failure to communicate. In order to create the ideal Windsock, journalists and students must be in touch with each other. Your journalists want to be your microphone. We want to be your written word, the vox populi, the voice of the people of the EMHS community.
- Co-Editor Hannah Cranston








