Vandals Disrupt EMHS Community
We've all heard the story by now.
Late Sunday night, four vandals defaced dozens of windows at EMHS, covering them with obscenities and hate speech. Police took the vandals into custody after being notified by a neighbor, and soon Dean of Students Sherman Eberly and Principal Paul Leaman arrived to assess the damage. Fortunately, the paint used was water soluble, and all of the graffiti was cleaned up before students arrived. The school administration, seeking to avoid what Principal Leaman termed "undue disruption" and "undue alarm," considered keeping the incident secret from the student body and general public.
Any such efforts floundered, however, when local media began reporting on the event and the administration was forced to openly address the incident. Principal Leaman informed the student body of the crime during Monday's chapel. Even after the story became public knowledge, officials attempted to lessen the crime's perceived importance, again hoping to avoid "undue disruption" and "undue alarm." Principal Leaman said he believes that acting any other way might have made the situation worse.
Meanwhile, the incident was especially painful for EMHS teachers John and Glenda Leonard, as the graffiti contained vicious insults targeted against their family. Mrs. Leonard said she was "deeply hurt" by the slurs. "Even if you just walk down the street and see something like that," she said, "it's hurtful, but when it becomes personal, it hurts even more. Then, when our children were brought into it, it made it even worse." She said she was "disappointed" by efforts to downplay the severity of the crime, saying it initially made her feel that the community thought no one was harmed by the vandalism. She added, however, that she came to appreciate the community's concern for both the victims and the vandals, and that, as a recipient of that concern, it was "wonderful to know" that people cared about the Leonard family.
For his part, Principal Leaman concedes that mistakes were made and that the administration might have given the impression that the crime was not being taken seriously. He admits that he "could have used better words" when he told the Daily News Record the vandals were "not acting maliciously," explaining that he did not know precisely what malicious meant. In addition, he says that while trying to keep students and their parents calm, more should have been done to emphasize that the vandals were "spitting in the face" of the EMHS community. All the same, he stands by the situation's handling as a whole.
Where do we go from here?
Principal Leaman says that the vandals are welcome to establish a relationship with the EMHS community if they wish and that he is willing to speak with the families of the perpetrators. He also hopes that the community will move forward rather than being dominated by the incident.
Mrs. Leonard, meanwhile, says she hopes that the vandalism will provide "an opportunity for change" in the school and the community, believing that if the incident provokes positive action, then the pain it caused will not have been in vain. "We're beginning to heal," she added.
-Dustin Crummett






